Bilderberg's secret agenda 2005
On the eve of a triumphant journey by Mr Bush to the soil of the old
continent, preceeded by Mrs Condoleeza Rice’s trip, all indicators show
that Europe's leaders are only pretending in their 'opposition' to the
US.
In Nice (South of France), Mr. Rumsfeld managed to persuade Europeans
to train and finance thousands of new Iraqi police. NATO is now to
redeploy in Afghanistan and help the US military rebuild this country.
Saudi Arabia has seen its first local elections after the great success
of the Iraqi ones. Ukraine was holding its own at the end of last year
with the subversive help from some US CIA ‘s backed organizations.
A so calling “best US informed man” and former Reagan’s aide named Jack
Wheeler (see in worldnetdaily.com who I am referring to…) is seriously
suggesting Mr G. W. Bush should receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his
eminent role in establishing democracy in these countries.
Meanwhile, Bush is referring to the courage and the writings of a
former Russian resister, Natan Sharansky. However, Israeli Barry
Chamish believes this cold war hero was in fact a KGB informer. So on
this sinister stage where the blind follow the lies in a mirror, we may
certainly fear the worst direction from these leaders.
The Power of Democracy - a Quick Look
The first thing to examine when they are speaking of democracy is to
see which democracy they (the US administration) are wanting to install.
In their mouths democracy is sounding as a real people’s democracy (no
real intention from my part to write ‘popular’ democracy which is, as
everybody knows, another body).
In fact a quick examination of the guys they are following and helping
is showing these guys are attracted by the European model or wanting to
evade an external influence. This is really evident in the Ukrainian
case, where Yutschenko (married to an American woman) is politically
binded to Yulia Timochenko, an Ukrainian billionnaire, whose past was
in business in Russian petroleum and gas. We have the oil and we have
the democracy now. But is it really a democracy where the people in the
street are having a word to say? Apparently yes, since the orange
revolution, but we may not forget the river of money that flowed out of
the pockets of Soros ‘s foundations as well as from American
foundations (Freedom’s house directed by former CIA director Woosley,
New Endowment for democracy known as a CIA relais since its implication
in the Venezuelian coup d’état.
Up to now, the structure of Ukrainian power and democracy is based on
some ploutocrat looking like a MAFIA mob. The difference with the
former is that they are now a Western looking mob.
The Georgian revolution funded by Soros ‘s organizations is in
difficulties. Georgia is situated south of the Caspian Sea and Putin is
showing no sign of abandon in Chétchénia at the opposite (see his
declarations in Autschwitz against terrorism mimicing the US). First
minister of Georgia recently died of Carbon Dioxide poisoning when
sleeping and he was the right arm of the president of this country.
Russians have no intentions of moving from their Georgian base as well
from Sebastopol, in Ukrainian Crimea where the Russian South See Navy
stands.
Naturally, The Caucases are known to have a lot of oil.
Democracy in Iraq is going to lead this country (containing petroleum)
to have a Shia governement .Violence is not to ease soon. Difference
between Iraq and Georgia has to be found in the localization: Iraq
doesn't belong to the Caucase basin but to the Great MiddleEast where
democracy (democracy is liking oil as you noticed it immediately at the
first glance).
Great Middle East , as well Saudi Arabia where the first local elections were held ( in absence of women…not invited to vote).
Next surprise will come out in Lebanon where the UN asked Syria to
leave the country. Jumblatt and Aoun in next polling will make the
difference, thanks to America. Naturally , Syria is threathened
regularly of American intervention. And assassinations will happen.
Israel is a big part of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) plan:
two countries side by side and the entrance of the two countries in the
European union once peace is acquired.
So we may discriminate two policies having the same oil control target.
1.Eurasia policy for the north of Europe (following Brzezinsky theories) 2.Great Middle east policy for the South of Europe.
We move to the Bilderberg 2005 agenda
These policies will be again on the table at next Bilderberg meeting
for sure. Europe is in competition about commerce in the Maghreb
(Tunisia, Marocco, Lybia. Egypt is fully in the hands of the US
interests As well as Jordania and..Israel.)
Now, a more difficult task is awaiting Europeans about competitiveness
and the Lisbon agenda. In fact, the entrance of low level cost price
countries in 2004 in Europe will displace the benefit of European aid
policies towards the East, leading to more economic difficulties in the
south (France, Germany, benelux, Italy etc.).
NATO and the European Constitution
The constitution of Europe to be voted this year in Europe and next
year in England is having in its chapter III, a whole commerce code
meaning an end of European Social security with Frits Bolkenstein’s
directive fleshed out by the text.
This constitution is authorizing legally the NATO to be the only
official frame of European’s future defense forces. (First part of the
text). In one sentence, Europe’s future is definitively cemented in the
wedding with the American direction.
This is to be voted “democrately”, but with the respective governments hiding these important facts.
As a matter of confirmation of the influence of NATO upon Europe, last
December was the inclusion of Turkey inside Europe imposed by America
and decided by Europe. This shameful decision was pushed by the
commissioner to “broadening” of Europe, Mr Gunther Verheugen, member of
Bilderberg. A contact inside the IFRI told me this was requested with
force by the USA above all protestations possible.
Where is the “democracy” in all this?
In next article we will have a deeper look upon the Iranian question,
the consequences of Turkey entrance, Eurasia, China and the weapon
debate, Money and the real plutocratic democracy role in a next future.
Part II - Bloomsbury and Hell's Bells
Raymond Fodsick was a Woodrow Wilson’s friend and the most influencial
man of his generation along with Colonel House. In company of one of
his pupils, Beardsley Ruml, and the help of John Davison Rockefeller
III, they established the “Memorial and the General Education Board” to
study the population growth problems.
Ruml was in contact since the 1920 ‘s with Graham Wallas, a founder of
the Fabian Society. Together, they established with the help of the
Laura Spelman Rockefeller Fund, a rostrum of Social Science in
Bloomsbury under control of the Fabian Society. Ruml was too a member
of the National Planning Association where were sitting Felix
Frankfurter, Eric Johnston , future founder of the Atlantic Institute,
Norman Cousins, etc.. all of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) a
private US foreign policy club.
Fodsick was a partisan of “Internationalist “ organizations. To control
the government.He obtained from John Davison Rockefeller III the means
to strengthen the “Institute of Government Research” which with the
help of Robert Brookings a few years later became the “Brookings
Institute”.
Fodsick, with Thomas W. Lamont and the infamous Colonel House founded
the “ Council on Foreign Relations “ and the “Foreign Policy
Association”( in this case in company of Felix Frankfurter and Paul
Warburg)
So, we may deduce from this: The establishment of the CFR was to
control the US governement. All Institutes of Fodsick including the
work he did on the Brooking Institution and the Foreign Policy
Association was leading to this goal. All identical Institutes in
foreign countries led to this target too including the Royal Institute
for International Afairs (RIIA) in England and other institutions
founded abroad. So when in the FAQ on the websites of the Trilateral,
CFR we see: “Is the Trilateral a plot?” with the answer :” Not at all”
we are authorized, frankly, to laugh.
This plan intends to guide the US ‘s government actions as well as
foreign governments' actions with respect to the interests of the
richest of the American riches dynasties or powerful European and
worldwide plutocratic groups .
This is an invisible hand. You ‘ll never directly see the hand. You see
the CFR’s recommendations and reports and you‘ll see the congressmen
vote. You never see the hand guiding them. The same with Bilderberg and
Europe, 99% of people living in an EU which was born at Bilderberg have
never heard of it. But the Bilderberg’s reports are not available for
the public although the names of the members of these caucuses are
never quoted.
“In late 1952, Josef Retinger went to America to try the idea out on
his American contacts.Among others, he saw such old friends as Averell
Harriman, David Rockefeller, and Bedell Smith, then director of the
CIA. After Retinger explained his proposal, Smith said “ Why the Hell
didn’t you come to me in the first place?” .He quickly referred
Retinger to C.D. Jackson, who was about to become Eisenhower‘s special
assistant for warfare…in May 1954, the first conference was held in the
hotel de Bilderberg..” (The chairman, John Mc Cloy, the making of the
American Establishmenté by Kai Bird’s as quoted in 'Who’s Who of the
Elite' by Robert Gaylon Ross)
Averell Harriman was a Yale 'Skull & Bones' seret society member
and a former associate of Prescott Bush (GW's grandad) in his Nazi
collaberating oil business. McCloy was responsible for the bombing upon
Germany during the war as well as an OSS (forerunner of the CIA)
officer.
Asked why Auschwitz was never bombed (or the railroad leading to the
camp) he answered: “If we did something in favor of the Jews, the
Greeks would have asked the same for them”.
In my idea there were not so much Greeks interned in comparison of the
Jews and this is an historical fact that factories with US interests
were never bombed in Germany, this was no accident. The camps were
providing the workforce needed for the US interests in Germany at a
real low cost for the American profiteers and there is no question to
contest that money has no smell.
Harriman became the European responsible for the George Marshall ‘s
plan in Europe, while McCloy was director honorary for the CFR,
president of the Ford Foundation, director at the Chase Manhattan Bank,
member of Bilderberg etc…and a member of the Warren Commission about
the murder of President Kennedy (curiously he and Allen Dulles were
members of the Permindex company quoted by Garrison, in company of
general Walker and the landlord Byrd of the Texas book depository).
A European Democratic Revolution
In his book “ The great Chessboard”, Zbigniew Brzezinski is telling us:
“Europe is the geostrategical fundamental stronghold position for
America. The Atlantic Alliance is authorizing America to have a
political influence and a military weight upon the continent…If Europe
increases, this will directly benefit American influence…”
Brzezinski goes on “ Western Europe is staying in a large measure an
American Protectorate and his states are remembering us who were the
vassals and tribute payers of the old empires”
“Europe has to solve the problem caused by his social redistribution
sytem which is too heavy and preventing European capacity of
initiatives”
Attempt to crush social security
Thus, for Brzezinski, the social security net in Europe, a great post
war blessing in Britain, is paralyzing the capacity of Europe to expand
and find a common sense in European patriotism. Naturally, America is
impatient to have more power and influence upon the continent. So
pressure is increasing through Bilderberg to develop and increase
Europe. This is explaining all through Europe these initiatives having
as target to dismantle the whole social security system under the one
of other economical or social pretext.
The plain fact that all people of European nations paid for social security through taxation does not occur to Brzezinski.
Valery Giscard d’ Estaing (Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg) is the
so called “father” of the European Constitution and is a real close
friend of Kissinger. His constitutional will be written in marble, if
accepted. The NATO heart of Europe as well that the social regression
in the whole Europe. Brzezinski is not even thinking to the social
troubles or revolutions his initiative might lead to… My inside source
in the IFRI told me that the Bolkenstein directive will find full force
on July 15, 2005 as well as the Investment Agreement.
You know what is MAI. (Multilateral Agreement on Investments).
Everybody thought this social monstruosity was definitively put in the
dustbin. Error, the beast is coming back.
In the same vein, the integration of Turkey in Europe will permit US
imperialism to have a strong hand upon the south of the Caspian Sea, as
well as having an influence upon the states of the east side of the
Mediterranean basin. This will achieve the US “democratic” move on this
region while the Western part will be submitted to the action of NGO’s
towards more democracy as a last year article from the German Marshall
Fund in the paper “ Le Monde”instructively showed us.
In Short, a subversive hurricaine is about to blow upon Europe and its
suburbs in the next few years with politics and social consequences not
yet studied by this morning’s magicians. Bilderberg 2005 calls these
“social enhancements”.
Iran Russia and China
What about Iran? The point is that Iran is a regional power, able to
work with Russia and China together and turning it to a valid
opposition to the American Empire in Eurasia.
If we remember well, the Paalavi’s dynasty was thrown out of power in
Iran in the year 1979 when America decided his willingness to make Iran
a regional power equipped with atomic weapons was not supported by
American regional intentions. So, they preferred to work with the
backward minds of Ayatollah Khomeyni, but Khomeyni was not intending to
work with the friends of Israël. So, America encouraged Saddam ‘s Iraq
to engage a terrible war against its neighbour.
Saddam was a close friend to America then, although he was not practicing “democracy”.
Now, 25 years later, the same state is having the same objectives that
the Shah in Shah. A big mistake having been done, Iran is again at the
feet of America with no intention at all to let America dominate
Eurasia. As Russia and China have the same goals, they all three powers
have the possibility to block the American expansion.
Nuclear games to play today
The main goal being not to prevent Iran to have the atomic weapon but
well to prevent Iran to be a regional power in any case, the USA are
intended to dismantle Iran from the inside, having not enough military
forces to invade and submit Teheran. This country is having oil,
naturally And that is helping America to try to convert these Muslims
to he virtues of the American democratic way of life.
The interests of China are going towards the oil of central Asia, in
the same time the interests of Turkey and Iran are pointing in the same
direction. The Alliance of Iran and China in petroleum matters are
preventing USA from controlling the tab on the Chinese oil. Naturally
an alliance between Iran, China and Russia would exclude America from
the Kazakhstan oil fields and will not tolerate the presence of
pipeline leading to the Mediterranean region, which is what Washington
wants.
So to the insistence of the US threaths, Iran will answer with more Agressiveness in the central Asian oil fields States.
Limitations on Chinese Ambitions
As specially defined by the Brzezinski doctrine, no country or groups
of country will be allowed to challenge the hyperpower status of the
USA.
America has implicitly allowed China to dump its money since the years
1980 against a limited place of this country in the New World Order,
the New American Empire. But now, China wants to take its natural place
in the South Asiatic Region.
Economically, China is a success story and the end of textile quotas is
permitting China to invade the European markets. This is weakening the
European textile industries and weakening the buying power of European
money.
Logically, sales of European weapons are to counter balance this trade
and to permit China to have the adequate military forces equal to its
power status. But this means too that the policy of China will no more
be in the hands of Washington, and that in a near future, Taiwan might
just be invaded. And Japan forced to acquire atomic weapons too in
order to defend itself.
Condoleeza Rice as well as George W. Bush will try to limit theses
European sales. With some disgust they did not appreciate the recent
position of Mr. Blair on this question. Maybe Tony Blair is no more the
lap-dog of mr Bush? Probably, China is going to know some restrictions
on vital matters as oil, steel, strategic materials and obliged to
accept to reconsider its yuan value or to be considered as a former
member of international WTO etc..
Naturally, America is a net borrower and will be obliged to stop to
borrow. Not to sink before a flow of Chinese paper coming back for
immediate refund, USA would be obliged to devaluate its money from one
day to the other, even if America is showing good signs of activity.
This would mean ruin for all Asia and America. But America is able to
turn towards its European allies and, within a few years, its debt
could be patched up.
In short, to limit the Asiatic risks, China will be forced to freeze
activities and certainly through the revaluation of the yuan. This will
be in a more harder way presented to China by the Allies. Bilderberg
2005 will be considering this deeply.
China and Russia
Naturally, after the CIA aided 'Ukraine joins West' affair, Russia and
China are tempted to work together and working with Iran to
counterbalance the American penetration of Eurasia. They have already
penetrated the South American markets to “free” South America from the
non democratic Monroe doctrine. His is “de bonne guerre” and
exasperating Washington. Common maneuvers are scheduled and everything
is showing that with or without the European weapons, China will be
able to repel the American interests in its strategic sphere.
Iran war, to be or not to be?
It will be a matter of provocation. A country that is not America could
be tempted of doing the job by its own means. The day after, here will
be no more nuclear forces in Iran but a climate of war with a direct
implication in Irak of Teheran’s interests or occidental interests
leading a formidable propaganda to push Europe to a war against this
country in collaboration with Turkey and the USA. And a secret hope
that this country would fall as a cabin as the first European forces
are entering the country with the “United Nation” benediction. This
would happen in any case after the Iranian elections. Iran would then
cease to the obstacle to the American domination of Eurasia.
First Conclusions: the earthquake tension at Bilderberg 2005
Bilderberg 2005 will be a decisive conference. The way Europeans will
vote to the Constitutionnal treaty is vital to our future. Spain is not
considering seriously the importance of this vote, and the official
propaganda is favoring the “Yes” vote. The “No” vote would oblige them
to negotiate in telling the truth about what this poll really
represents. They may in this case organize some spectacular incident
showing they are not representing democracy but the interests of
plutocracy.
As America is fighting for more and more democracy outside its borders,
there is less and less freedoms and liberties inside their own borders.
(Patriot Acts I & II). What is called democracy is effectively
representing the force and influence of a little class of American,
European, Turkish, Asiatic elite. This force is helped by a hyper
bourgeoisie force working as the waiters of this elite or knowing
carefully what not to do and say to upset their masters.
THE BILDERBERGER GROUP
from FINAL WARNING: A HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Dr. Joseph H. Retinger (who died in 1960), economist, political
philosopher, communist Poland’s Charge d’Affaires, and a major
proponent of a united Europe; along with Prince Bernhard (of
Lippe-Biesterfeld) of the Netherlands, Colin Gubbins (former director
of the British SOE, Special Operations Executive), and Gen. Walter
Bedell Smith (former American Ambassador to Moscow, and director of the
CIA, who said when he took over the CIA: “We can’t lick world
communism- no counterinsurgency plans will work. We must compromise and
co-exist with communism.” He later became an Under Secretary of State
in the Eisenhower Administration); joined together in 1954 to organize
this secret group. Created under the direction of Alastair Buchan, son
of Lord Tweedsmuir, and Chairman of the Royal Institute of
International Affairs; its governing council was made up of Robert
Ellsworth (Lazard Freres), John Loudon (N. M. Rothschild), Paul Nitze
(Shroeder Bank), C. L. Sulzberger (New York Times), Stansfield Turner
(who later became CIA Director), Peter Calvocoressi (Penguin Books),
Andrew Schoenberg (RIIA), Daniel Ellsberg, and Henry Kissinger.
Bernhard said: “It is difficult to reeducate the people who have been
brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their
sovereignty to a supranational body…” Lord Rothschild and Laurance
Rockefeller handpicked 100 of the world’s elite, and they have a heavy
cross membership with the Council on Foreign Relations (which they
control), the English Speaking Union, the Pilgrims Society, the Round
Table, and the Trilateral Commission. Their purpose was to regionalize
Europe, according to Giovanni Agnelli, the head of Fiat, who said:
“European integration is our goal and where the politicians have
failed, we industrialists hope to succeed.” In Alden Hatch’s biography
of Bernhard, he stated that the Bilderberg Group gave birth to the
European Community (now the European Union). Their ultimate goal is to
have a one-world government. Their first meeting was held at the Hotel
de Bilderberg (hence the name of the group, even though they have
referred to themselves as ‘The Alliance’) in Oosterbeek, Holland, from
May 29-31, in 1954. Charles Douglas Jackson (Vice President of Time
magazine, delegate to the United Nations, Special Assistant to the
President, and later publisher of Life magazine), spokesman for the
American delegation, led by David Rockefeller, promised those present:
“Whether he (Sen. Joseph McCarthy) dies by an assassin’s bullet, or is
eliminated in the normal American way of getting rid of boils on the
body politic, I prophecy that by the time we hold our next meeting, he
will be gone from the American scene.”
McCarthy was the crusading Senator who revealed that communists had
infiltrated high level posts within the U.S.Government. He didn’t die
until 1957. The Bilderbergers hold annual meetings in locations all
over the world. In Europe, the Rothschilds have hosted some of the
meetings, while the meetings in 1962 and 1973, in Saltsjobaden, Sweden,
were hosted by the Wallenbergs (who had an estimated fortune of $10
billion). The meetings were chaired by the German-born Prince Bernhard,
the husband of Queen Juliana of the Netherlands, said to be the richest
woman in the world (because of her partnership with Baron Victor
Rothschild in the Royal Dutch Shell Oil Co., owning 5% of the stock,
which in 1978 was worth $425 million; and also holds stock in Exxon),
until he was forced to resign in August, 1976, because of his
involvement in the Lockheed Aircraft bribery scandal, and his
extramarital affairs. Bernhard wrote: “Here comes our greatest
difficulty. For the governments of the free nations are elected by the
people, and if they do something the people don’t like they are thrown
out. It is difficult to reeducate the people who have been brought up
on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty
to a supernational body...” Walter Scheel of Germany took over as
Chairman, and then it was Britain’s Lord Carrington, who is on the
Board of the Hambros Bank.
There are about 120 participants that are invited to the Bilderberg
meetings, of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the rest are
from North America; and about one-third are from government and
politics, and the other two-thirds are from the fields of finance,
industry, labor, education, communications. The meetings are closed to
the public and the press, although a brief press conference is usually
held at the conclusion of each meeting, to reveal, in general terms,
some of the topics which were discussed. The resort areas and hotels
where they meet, are cleared of residents and visitors, and surrounded
by soldiers, armed guards, the Secret Service, State and local police.
All conference and meeting rooms are scanned for bugging devices before
every single meeting. Among those who have attended their meetings:
Owen Lattimore (CFR, former Director of Planning and Coordination for
the State Department), Winston Lord (CFR, Clinton’s Assistant Secretary
of State), Allen Dulles (CIA), Sen. J. William Fulbright (from
Arkansas, a Rhodes Scholar), Dean Acheson (Secretary of State under
Truman), Gabriel Hauge (Assistant to President Eisenhower, who
according to the Wall Street Journal, “helped teach Ike what to think”;
and later became Chairman of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.), George
Ball (CFR, Johnson’s Under Secretary of State from 1961-66, and foreign
policy consultant to Nixon), Philip Jessup (representative to the
International Court), Henry A. Kissinger (Chairman, Kissinger
Associates), David Rockefeller (Member, JP Morgan International
Council), Nelson Rockefeller, Laurance Rockefeller, Dean Rusk
(Kennedy’s Secretary of State and former President of the Rockefeller
Foundation), Gerald Ford, Henry J. Heinz II (Chairman of the H. J.
Heinz Co.), Sen. Henry M. Jackson, Sen. Jacob J. Javits (NY), Prince
Philip of Great Britain, Lord Louis Mountbatten, Denis Healy (former
British Defense Minister), Manlio Brosio (Secretary of NATO), Wilfred
S. Baumgartner (Bank of France), Guido Carli (Bank of Italy), Thomas L.
Hughes (President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace),
Robert S. McNamara (Kennedy’s Secretary of Defense and former President
of the World Bank), Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister of England),
Valery Giscard D’Estaing (President of France), Harold Wilson (Prime
Minister of England), Edward Heath (Prime Minister of England), William
P. Bundy (former President of the Ford Foundation, and editor of
the CFR’s Foreign Affairs journal), John J. McCloy former President of
the Chase Manhattan Bank), Christian Herter (Secretary of State under
Eisenhower), Lester Pearson (former Prime Minister of Canada), Shepard
Stone (Director of International Affairs for the Ford Foundation), Dirk
U. Stikker (Secretary-General of NATO), Gardner Cowles (Editor-in-Chief
and Publisher of Look magazine), Paul G. Hoffman (of the Ford
Foundation, U.S. Chief of Foreign Aid, and head of the UN Special
Fund), Donald H. Rumsfeld (President Ford’s and George W. Bush’s
Secretary of Defense), Father Theodore M. Hesburgh (former President of
Notre Dame University), Helmut Schmidt (Chancellor of West Germany),
George F. Kennan (former U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union), Paul H.
Nitze, Robert O. Anderson (Chairman of Atlantic-Richfield Co. and head
of the Aspen Institute for Humanisitic Studies), Donald S. MacDonald
(Canadian Minister of National Defense), Prince Claus of the
Netherlands, Marcus Wallenberg (Chairman of Stockholm’s EnskiIda Bank),
Nuri M. Birgi (Turkish Ambassador to NATO), Bill Moyers (journalist),
William F. Buckley (editor of National Review), John D. Rockefeller IV
(Governor of West Virginia, now U.S. Senator), Cyrus Vance (Secretary
of State under Carter), Rep. Donald F. Fraser, Rep. Peter
Frelinghuysen, Rep. Henry S. Reuss, Rep. Donald W. Riegle, Sen. Adlai
Stevenson III, Sen. Charles Mathias (MD), Lt. Gen. John W. Vogt (former
Director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), Eugene Black (former President
of the World Bank), Joseph Johnson (President of the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace), Hannes Androsch (Austrian Minister of
Finance), David J. McDonald (President of the United Steelworkers
Union), Paul van Zeeland (Prime Minister of Belgium), Pierre Commin
(Secretary of the French Socialist Party), Imbriani Longo
(Director-General of the Banco Nationale del Lavoro in Italy), Vicomte
Davignon (Belgium Minister of Foreign Affairs), Walter Leisler Kiep
(member of the German Parliament), Ole Myrvoll (member of Norway’s
Parliament), Krister Wickman (former Swedish Minister of Foreign
Affairs, and Governor of the Bank of Sweden), Sen. Walter Mondale (MN,
later Vice President under Carter), Rep. Thomas S. Foley (former
Speaker of the House), Henry Ford III (head of the Ford Motor Co.),
Gen. Walter Bedell Smith, Gen. Andrew J. Goodpaster (former Supreme
Allied Commander in Europe, and later superintendent of the West Point
Academy), Zbigniew Brzezinski, Gen. Alexander Haig (European NATO
Commander, former assistant to Kissinger, later became Secretary of
State under Reagan), Alan Greenspan (Chairman, Federal Reserve System),
C. Douglas Dillon (Secretary of Treasury in the Kennedy and Johnson
Administrations, from Dillon, Read and Co.), Baron Edmond de
Rothschild, Pierce Paul Schweitzer (Managing Director of the UN’s
International Monetary Fund), Paul B. Finney (editor of Fortune
magazine), James Rockefeller (Chairman, First National City Bank),
Giovanni Agnelli (Chairman of Fiat in Italy), Otto Wolff von Amerongen
(German industrialist), Theo Sommer (German newspaper columnist),
Arthur Taylor (former Chairman of CBS-TV), Neil Norlund
(Editor-in-Chief of Berlingske Tindende in Denmark), and Sen. Lloyd
Bentsen (TX, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, candidate for
Vice President in 1988 with Michael Dukakis, and now the Secretary of
Treasury under Bill Clinton). Although this list is a bit tedious to go
through, you have probably started to see how the same names keep
showing up over and over. Bilderberg policy is carried out by a 35
member Bilderberg Steering Committee, including an inner circle known
as an Advisory Committee, which is said to be made up of Giovanni
Agnelli (Italy), David Rockefeller (U.S.), Eric Roll (Great Britain),
and Otto Wolff von Amerongen (Germany). Some of the Steering Committee
members are: Henry Kissinger, Jessica T. Mathews (President, Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace), James D. Wolfensohn (President,
World Bank), Marie-Josee Kravis (Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute), and
Jorma Ollila (Chairman of the Board and CEO of Nokia Corp.). All
American members of the Steering Committee are members of the CFR.
A few of the Bilderberg permanent U.S. members are: George W. Ball,
Gabriel Hauge, Richard C. Holbrooke, Winston Lord, Bill Moyers, and
Paul Wolfowitz.
The permanent Bilderberg Secretariat is located at: 1 Smidswater, the
Hague, the Netherlands (though another address is sometimes reported at
2301 Da Leiden, in the Netherlands) Their address in America was at 345
E. 46th Street, in New York City (which was also the location of the
Trilateral Commission, and the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace). The American Friends of Bilderbergs, with offices at 477
Madison Avenue (6th floor) in New York City, is an IRS-approved
charitable organization that received regular contributions from the
likes of Exxon, Arco, and IBM; while their meetings are funded by the
Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and the Carnegie Endowment
Fund.
The Goals 2000 program, developed during the presidency of George Bush
to revamp the nation’s public school system, was born at the April,
1970, Bilderberger meeting in Bad Ragaz, Switzerland. The purpose of
the new educational philosophy was the “subordination of national
ambitions to the idea of the international community.” Because our
schools are “too nationalistic,” children, in the future, will be
indoctrinated to consider themselves “world citizens.” Prior to the
1971 meeting in Woodstock, Virginia, Prince Bernhard said that the
subject of the meeting was the “change in the world role of the United
States.” After the weekend conference, Kissinger was sent to Red China
to open up trade relations, and an international monetary crisis
developed, which prompted the devaluing of the dollar by 8.57% (which
made a tremendous profit for those who converted to the European
Currency).
In 1976, fifteen representatives from the Soviet Union attended the
meeting which was held in the Arizona desert, and it was believed, that
at that time, the plans were formulated for the “break-up of communism
in the Soviet Union.” At the 1978 meeting, they predicted that a
depression would hit the world in 1979, and that the dollar would die.
Their solution was to replace the dollar with an international ‘bancor’
system (international bank note) of currency that would be universally
acceptable as a medium of exchange. The ‘bancor’ system would have the
international gold reserve deposited in a neutral country. It is an
offshoot of the same Keynesian system developed at Bretton Woods in
1944 from the idea by German economist Julius Wolf in 1892. This system
would protect the Illuminati when they spring their trap, and the world
economy would crumble.
At their 1990 meeting at Glen Cove, Long Island in New York, they
decided that taxes had to be raised to pay more towards the debt owed
to the International Bankers. And George Bush, who pledged during the
campaign, “Read my lips- no new taxes!” found himself signing one of
the biggest tax increases in history on November 15, 1990, a move which
was a contributing factor to his defeat when he ran for re-election.
At their 1991 meeting at the Black Forest resort in Baden Baden,
Germany, they discussed plans for a common European currency, and
European central banking; and reviewed Middle Eastern events and
developments in the Soviet Union. David Rockefeller, said during the
meeting: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times,
Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have
attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years ... It would have been impossible for us to develop
our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of
publicity during these years. But, the world is now more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries.”
Then Governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton (a Rhodes Scholar, who attended
Oxford University in England), was invited to speak, and a decision was
made to endorse his candidacy (according to Jim Tucker, a Spotlight
reporter, who had a source within the group, code-named ‘Pipeline’). No
wonder Clinton was able to survive all the media attacks regarding his
personal life and lack of experience. One of his top money men was
investor and international banker Jackson Stephens, who also donated
$100,000 to the Bush campaign. His wife was the Co-Chairwoman of the
national “Bush for President” organization in 1988. Also in attendance,
were Michael Boskin, Chairman of Bush’s Council of Economic Advisors,
who was a speaker; Nicholas Brady, U.S. Treasury Secretary; and Vice
President Dan Quayle, who impressed the group enough, that there was
talk of supporting him for the Republican nomination in 1996. In fact,
after the meeting, Bilderberger member Katherine Graham, head of the
Washington Post, published a series of positive articles on Quayle.
At their 1992 meeting, the group discussed the possibility of
“conditioning the public to accept the idea of a UN army that could, by
force, impose its will on the internal affairs of any nation.” Henry
Kissinger, who attended the meeting, said: “Today, Americans would be
outraged if UN forces entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow,
they will be grateful.”
The official press release for their 2002 Conference said:
“Bilderberg’s only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings,
no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements
issued.” They are just “a small flexible, informal and off-the-record
international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and
mutual understanding enhanced.” However, Phyllis Schlafly wrote in A
Choice Not An Echo, that the Bilderbergers are a “little clique of
powerful men who meet secretly and plan events that appear to "just
happen".
(4 May 2005) |